First time here? We are a friendly community of Power Systems Engineers. Check out the FAQ!
2019-08-22 04:19:03 -0500 | received badge | ● Famous Question (source) |
2019-08-22 04:19:03 -0500 | received badge | ● Notable Question (source) |
2019-04-04 03:21:43 -0500 | received badge | ● Popular Question (source) |
2019-04-01 01:04:44 -0500 | asked a question | Regarding interruptible load modelling in PSS/E I am trying to model the interruptible load for the dynamic simulation to analyse its impact on frequency deviation. How can this can be executed in PSS/E? |
2018-09-17 14:26:29 -0500 | received badge | ● Famous Question (source) |
2018-06-30 00:25:13 -0500 | received badge | ● Notable Question (source) |
2018-06-26 11:06:27 -0500 | received badge | ● Famous Question (source) |
2018-06-25 01:07:00 -0500 | received badge | ● Popular Question (source) |
2018-06-24 03:36:05 -0500 | received badge | ● Notable Question (source) |
2018-06-23 09:48:58 -0500 | received badge | ● Notable Question (source) |
2018-06-22 09:09:38 -0500 | asked a question | Output is zero while running dynamic simulation Earlier I was facing the issue of LF while integration wind generation in the system, now it is being solved using flat start. But while going for dynamic analysis, its shows initial conditions suspect for many of the conventional generator parameters along with WT3 model of wind. When moving forward to initializing and applying bus fault showing some values in the output bar after clearing fault running it for more of 10 secs, after 1 sec of clearing fault showing zeros under all heads. Kindly guide through this. I am not able to understand the reason behind same. While running the dynamic simulation without wind integration everything is running fine. |
2018-06-21 03:29:54 -0500 | commented question | Integration of wind generation in Nordic-32 system Thr is another prob while running LF using full newton raphson method, each time outcome is diff. Wid flat start & don't flat start result differs each time wid same data. Cn u plz guide with this. Sometimes LF converges very fast with 0MW mismatch and no violation, sometimes its show some mismatch |
2018-06-18 00:02:06 -0500 | received badge | ● Popular Question (source) |
2018-06-14 08:19:01 -0500 | commented question | Integration of wind generation in Nordic-32 system Penetration of wind is 20%. No extra compensation is done. I thought the generator would adjust their generation on their own. What compensating devices can be added to meet the system requirement. |
2018-06-14 00:53:08 -0500 | commented question | Integration of wind generation in Nordic-32 system more than 50% of machines including wind is going to -2. 1/3 wind unit is reaching this limit. Just want to know which parameter needs to be modified to get the desired outcome. When I am changing an angle and voltage PU of the buses whr Wind is connected, there occurs some change in power mismatch. |
2018-06-14 00:43:22 -0500 | received badge | ● Enthusiast |
2018-06-13 05:34:59 -0500 | commented question | Integration of wind generation in Nordic-32 system When I am integrating 20% wind generation connecting the machines at buses where neither machine nor load is connected earlier. All machine code goes to -2 after load flow. After this, I am not able to go for dynamic analysis as while going for switching studies pss/e stopped working. |
2018-06-13 00:25:21 -0500 | received badge | ● Popular Question (source) |
2018-06-13 00:23:23 -0500 | commented question | Integration of wind generation in Nordic-32 system Yes, I am able to run load flow resulted in some mismatch at some far bus from the place where wind is integrated. |
2018-06-12 19:02:55 -0500 | received badge | ● Famous Question (source) |
2018-06-12 09:24:08 -0500 | asked a question | Integration of wind generation in Nordic-32 system While integrating wind generation by extending the bus results in many of the generating units reaching their reactive limit, after power flow codes of generators changed to -2. Can anyone guide me in this? Without integration load flow is running fine. I want to do the dynamic study by integrating the renewables and storage in the system. |
2018-06-10 01:56:44 -0500 | asked a question | dynamic simulation using bus fault I have performed dynamic simulation using bus fault at generator bus, as a result, the frequency rises just after the actuation of fault. I am not able to analyze the reason behind. Instead, if I would perform LLG or LG fault on the same bus, the frequency drops just after the fault. Further, I would like to know whether there is any other way by which plot using .outx file can be drawn at single y-axis rather than separate y-axis for each parameter in an individual sheet. |
2018-06-09 20:06:27 -0500 | received badge | ● Notable Question (source) |
2018-06-09 20:06:27 -0500 | received badge | ● Popular Question (source) |
2018-06-06 03:39:35 -0500 | commented answer | While adding CBEST model in PSSE 34 Initial condition suspect error occurred while initialization? Thank you. I will try and implement the same. |
2018-06-06 00:14:08 -0500 | asked a question | While adding CBEST model in PSSE 34 Initial condition suspect error occurred while initialization? Below message appears INITIAL CONDITIONS SUSPECT: I DSTATE(I) STATE(I) MODEL STATE BUS#-SCT X-- NAME --X BASKV ID 214 6.0500 0.0000 CBEST K+3 50003 G3 15.000 1 What is the reason for behind this error and how it can be rectified? |