Logic behind converting generator on Xd, X'd, X''d
What is the logic behind converting generator to current source on Xd, X'd, X''d. Usually it is converted to current source on X''d. Any specific reason for it?
What is the logic behind converting generator to current source on Xd, X'd, X''d. Usually it is converted to current source on X''d. Any specific reason for it?
The CONG activity converts the generator using its subtransient reactance (Xʺd). In short-circuit studies, however, you can modify the generator reactance to calculate the fault current for the subtransient, transient, or steady-state intervals.
For example, consider a simple case with one bus and one generator with the following parameters:
TYPE S X------POSITIVE SEQUENCE------X
BUS#-SCT X-- NAME --X BASKV ID CODE T R X" X' X
1 GEN 132.00 1 3 1 0.00000 0.20000 0.50000 1.00000
The results from the short-circuit calculation (ASCC) are as follows:
X------------ BUS ------------X RE(I+) IM(I+)
1 [GEN 132.00] PU 0.0000 -5.0000 Using X''D Isc = (1.0 / 0.2)
1 [GEN 132.00] PU 0.0000 -2.0000 Using X'D Isc = (1.0 / 0.5)
1 [GEN 132.00] PU 0.0000 -1.0000 Using XD Isc = (1.0 / 1.0)
This shows how the choice of reactance (subtransient, transient, or synchronous) directly affects the calculated short-circuit current.
No i am asking about CONG activity before proceeding to dynamic simulation. Why do i need to convert my generator on Xd, X'd, X''d? what is the logic behind it. why not a single value. As i understand if any disturbance occurs generator is in it subtransient mode initially but there is no.....
.....disturbance at the start of my simulation so do i still need to convert generator based on X''d at start?
whit loves you. Content on this site is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution Share Alike 3.0 license.