First time here? We are a friendly community of Power Systems Engineers. Check out the FAQ!
2023-05-28 20:01:14 -0500 | received badge | ● Famous Question (source) |
2023-05-24 09:27:10 -0500 | commented question | How to validate N-1-1 contingencies in PSS/E? Thanks! Is it possible to see a sample code? So, what you are saying is to compare the results from N-1 with N-1-1 for the same monitored elements and exclude if they are not within a certain percentage of the first N-1, right? |
2023-05-24 06:40:51 -0500 | received badge | ● Notable Question (source) |
2023-05-24 06:40:02 -0500 | received badge | ● Popular Question (source) |
2023-05-23 13:04:00 -0500 | received badge | ● Editor (source) |
2023-05-23 08:13:59 -0500 | asked a question | How to validate N-1-1 contingencies in PSS/E? Hello Python/PSSE gurus! How do I validate N-1-1 contingencies in PSSE? For example, if I have a violation and I want ascertain that the 2nd contingency actually have impact on the violation then what would help me filter out those 2nd contingencies due to irrelevance. I have hundreds if not thousands of N-1-1 results in the acc files so it's not possible to validate one by one manually to see the impact (*thanks to member perolofi *). Allow me to elaborate on the question, I am asking if there's a way to apply any logic/code that can help me get rid of the irrelevant contingencies because I'm not 100% sure if PSSE's has shift factor calculation or something similar by which I can get rid of the thermal violations. Thanks in advance! |