whit loves you. Content on this site is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution Share Alike 3.0 license.
| 2019-01-22 01:16:54 -0500 | received badge | ● Famous Question (source) |
| 2019-01-18 08:14:29 -0500 | received badge | ● Notable Question (source) |
| 2019-01-16 01:27:54 -0500 | commented answer | A contingency converges with FNSL, but not with ACCC Hi, thanks for your answer. Your solution reduced the mismatch I get, but I still don't get convergence. |
| 2019-01-16 01:14:52 -0500 | received badge | ● Popular Question (source) |
| 2019-01-15 11:32:09 -0500 | commented question | A contingency converges with FNSL, but not with ACCC Hi, thanks for the answer. Yes, I did. I am wondering if the ACCC activity is doing some simplification, which causes the solution to blow up. |
| 2019-01-14 11:43:06 -0500 | asked a question | A contingency converges with FNSL, but not with ACCC Hi, I am having a strange problem with contingency analysis using ACCC. For a contingency consisting of tripping of two lines it doesn't converge. However, if I change the status of these two lines to out of service and run a powerflow (FNSL) it converges. Does anyone have any idea why ACCC would have worse convergence than FNSL? |
whit loves you. Content on this site is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution Share Alike 3.0 license.