After simulating the disturbance, the reactive power response settles at a new value. However, in reality, after the transient phenomenon, the supervisory function restores the reactive power production to the value it had before the disturbance. How can this functionality be modeled?
Model PFQTYP2U can be used in rev 35 to model P.F. or Mvar control.
EDIT:
Block diagram is missing in rev 35 manual, here it is:
Thank you! So, I added that model and assumed the parameters because I coundn't find the expected ranges. I can't find the model in the "Dynamic data" tab. This is what I wrote in .dyr file: 91003, 'USRMDL', '1 ', 'PFQTYP2U', 27, 0, 1, 8, 3, 8, 0, 0.5, 10, 1, 15, -15, 0.1, 0.9, 1.1/
This might be a question for another topic. Thank you for the answers. The PFQTYP2U model is working as expected. What if I want to implement voltage control functionality for a synchronous generating unit based on a slope, for example 4%, similar to how SVC controls voltage? Is this possible?
Asked: 2025-04-24 01:35:27 -0500
Seen: 94 times
Last updated: May 02
whit loves you. Content on this site is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution Share Alike 3.0 license.
