Ask Your Question
0

How to validate N-1-1 contingencies in PSS/E?

asked 2023-05-23 08:13:59 -0500

PSSE_Python gravatar image

updated 2023-05-24 08:05:08 -0500

Hello Python/PSSE gurus!

How do I validate N-1-1 contingencies in PSSE? For example, if I have a violation and I want ascertain that the 2nd contingency actually have impact on the violation then what would help me filter out those 2nd contingencies due to irrelevance. I have hundreds if not thousands of N-1-1 results in the acc files so it's not possible to validate one by one manually to see the impact (*thanks to member perolofi *). Allow me to elaborate on the question, I am asking if there's a way to apply any logic/code that can help me get rid of the irrelevant contingencies because I'm not 100% sure if PSSE's has shift factor calculation or something similar by which I can get rid of the thermal violations. Thanks in advance!

edit retag flag offensive close merge delete

Comments

Use a script for the validation. Perform N-1 for each N-1-1 contingency and compare the violation.

perolofl gravatar imageperolofl ( 2023-05-24 08:38:17 -0500 )edit

Thanks! Is it possible to see a sample code? So, what you are saying is to compare the results from N-1 with N-1-1 for the same monitored elements and exclude if they are not within a certain percentage of the first N-1, right?

PSSE_Python gravatar imagePSSE_Python ( 2023-05-24 09:27:10 -0500 )edit

Yes, but exclude N-1-1 if they are WITHIN a certain percentage of N-1.

perolofl gravatar imageperolofl ( 2023-05-24 12:14:46 -0500 )edit

1 answer

Sort by ยป oldest newest most voted
0

answered 2023-05-24 06:41:50 -0500

perolofl gravatar image

Compare with the impact of an N-1 contingency.

edit flag offensive delete link more

Your Answer

Please start posting anonymously - your entry will be published after you log in or create a new account.

Add Answer

[hide preview]

Question Tools

1 follower

Stats

Asked: 2023-05-23 08:13:59 -0500

Seen: 646 times

Last updated: May 24 '23