Ask Your Question
0

Are exciter stabilizer and governor models necessary for dynamic simulation?

asked 2024-10-20 15:27:05 -0600

Uzair gravatar image

I have to do transient stability analysis and my .dyr file is exceeding the STATE variables limit as I have the limited version so can I do my simulation by removing exciter governor or stabilizer models or they all are necessary.

edit retag flag offensive close merge delete

Comments

Based on your purpose actually, if you don't need to observe the performance of SG, then in my opinion, you could remove these three type of model.

YKC gravatar imageYKC ( 2024-10-20 23:39:50 -0600 )edit

2 answers

Sort by ยป oldest newest most voted
0

answered 2024-10-25 01:32:30 -0600

perolofl gravatar image

For transient stability simulations (i.e. short circuits) you could reduce the dynamic model in the following order:

1 Remove governor models

2 Remove stabiliser models

3 Remove exciter models

Remove until the number of STATEs are within the limit. Start removing for small machines, e.g. remove exciter for small machines until the number of STATEs are ok. But, as @jconto wrote, keep exciters for generators close to the disturbance (short circuit).

edit flag offensive delete link more
1

answered 2024-10-24 09:46:25 -0600

jconto gravatar image

Exciters provide an insight on how the generator respond to voltage disturbances, governors do the same for frequency events. To remove them is to lose those dynamic behavior responses.

For a limited size PSSe version, remove models from generators (or GNET them) 'far away' from the study area where the fault/test is applied. Consider switching to a small-size network to perform your tests.

edit flag offensive delete link more

Your Answer

Please start posting anonymously - your entry will be published after you log in or create a new account.

Add Answer

[hide preview]

Question Tools

1 follower

Stats

Asked: 2024-10-20 15:27:05 -0600

Seen: 182 times

Last updated: Oct 25